The effect of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate on Polysulfone membrane for Pb (II) ions removal in an aqueous solution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31643/2025/6445.25Keywords:
polysulfone; sodium dodecyl sulfate; lead; membrane filtration; phase inversion.Abstract
An unsustainable level of contamination increase is driven by industrialization, population growth and growth in developing countries. Contamination of heavy metal ions in wastewater such as Pb (II) are non-biodegradable and poses a serious threat to human health and other living things. One of the major methods for treating heavy metals contamination is by chemical precipitation. However, it produced hazardous sludge that requires further treatment and used a significant quantity of chemicals during the heavy metals treatment process due to its low impact on the environment. As a result, a membrane filtration method as an alternative treatment for treating heavy metals in wastewater has been investigated. In this study, the membranes were fabricated using the wet phase inversion method approach by incorporating polysulfone (PSF) polymer with dimethylacetamide (solvent) and inclusion of different concentrations of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (M1= 0 wt%, M2= 0.5 wt%, M3= 1.0 wt%, M4= 1.5 wt%, M5= 2.0 wt%). The fabricated membranes were tested to remove 50 mg/L Pb (II) ions in aqueous solution. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to investigate the morphological structures of membranes. Moreover, the structural characteristics of fabricated membranes were evaluated according to these parameters; contact angle, porosity and mean pores radius. Furthermore, the performance of the membrane was also evaluated for permeation and rejection flux by using dead-end cell filtration. The results indicate that the M4 membrane with 1.5 wt% SDS had the highest rejection rate (90.52%) for Pb (II) ions. This is likely due to the presence of macrovoids and a porous structure, as shown by SEM analyses. Other supporting evidence includes a lower contact angle (63.91o), higher water uptake (43.58%), higher porosity (85.21%), and a lower mean pore radius (6 nm) for the M4 membrane. The fouling mechanism model suggests that the complete blocking observed in the experimental data indicates that porous blockage occurred on the membrane's surface during the absorption of Pb (II) ions. In conclusion, compared to the pure membrane, it becomes evident that the addition of SDS into the membrane solution enhanced the properties of the membranes. The M4 membrane with a composition of 1.5 wt% concentration SDS demonstrated optimal filtration for removing Pb (II) ions in a water treatment process due to excellent properties mentioned above.
Downloads
References
Singh J, Sharma M, and Basu S. Heavy metal ions adsorption and photodegradation of remazol black XP by iron oxide/silica monoliths: Kinetic and equilibrium modelling, Advance Powder Technology. 2018; 29(9):2268-2279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2018.06.011
Kolbasov A, Sinha-Ray S, Yarin A L, and Pourdeyhimi B. Heavy metal adsorption on solution-blown biopolymer nanofiber membranes, Journal Membrane Science. 2017; 530:250–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.02.019
Xu M, Hadi P, Chen G, and McKay G. Removal of cadmium ions from wastewater using innovative electronic waste-derived material, Journal Hazardous Material. 2014; 273:118-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.03.037
Vardhan K H, Kumar P S, and Panda R C. A review on heavy metal pollution, toxicity and remedial measures: Current trends and future perspectives, J. Mol. Liq. 2019; 290:111197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111197
Azimi A, Azari A, Rezakazemi M, and Ansarpour M. Removal of Heavy Metals from Industrial Wastewaters: A Review, ChemBioEng Rev. 2017; 4(1):37-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.201600010
Chaemiso T D. Removal Methods of Heavy Metals from Laboratory Wastewater, J. Nat. Sci. Res. 2019; 9(2):36-42. https://doi.org/10.7176/jnsr/9-2-04
Chandra Joshi N, Sharma R, and Singh A. Biosorption: A Review on Heavy Metal Toxicity and Advances of Biosorption on Conventional Methods, J. Chem. Chem. Sci. 2017; 7(9):714-724. www.chemistry-journal.org
Chukov D, Nematulloev S, Zadorozhnyy M, Tcherdyntsev V, Stepashkin A, and Zherebtsov D. Structure, mechanical and thermal properties of polyphenylene sulfide and polysulfone impregnated carbon fiber composites, Polymers (Basel). 2019; 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11040684
Abd Hamid S, Shahadat M, and Ismail S. Zeolite–polysulfone-based adsorptive membrane for removal of metal pollutants, Chem. Pap. 2021; 75(9):4479-4492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-021-01668-x
Shokri E, Yegani R, and Akbarzadeh A. Novel adsorptive mixed matrix membranes by embedding modified montmorillonite with arginine amino acid into polysulfones for As(V) removal, Appl. Clay Sci. 2017; 144:141-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2017.05.011
Benkhaya S, et al. Polysulfone/Polyetherimide Ultrafiltration composite membranes constructed on a three-component Nylon-fiberglass-Nylon support for azo dyes removal: Experimental and molecular dynamics simulations, Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021; 625:126941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126941
Gao Y, Li B, Zhong L, Zhang L, and Ding Z. Effect of nano-amphiphilic cellulose as a modifier to PSf composite membranes, Vacuum. 2014; 107:199-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2014.01.029
Ibrahim G P S. et al. Novel, one-step synthesis of zwitterionic polymer nanoparticles via distillation-precipitation polymerization and its application for dye removal membrane, Sci. Rep. 2017; 7(1):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16131-9
Ibrahim G P S. et al. Performance intensification of the polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane by blending with copolymer encompassing novel derivative of poly(styrene-co-maleic anhydride) for heavy metal removal from wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2018; 353:425-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.07.098
Khajouei M, Najafi M, and Jafari S A. Development of ultrafiltration membrane via in-situ grafting of nano-GO/PSF with anti-biofouling properties, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2019; 142:34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2018.11.033
Fainerman V B, Mobius D, and Miller R. Surfactants: Chemistry, Interfacial Properties, Applications. 2001.
Mao X, Jiang R, Xiao W, and Yu J. Use of surfactants for the remediation of contaminated soils: A review, J. Hazard. Mater. 2015; 285:419-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.009
Fernández E, Benito J M, Pazos C, and Coca J. Ceramic membrane ultrafiltration of anionic and nonionic surfactant solutions, Journal Membrane Science. 2005; 246(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.04.007
Peyravi M, Rahimpour A, Jahanshahi M, Javadi A, and Shockravi A. Tailoring the surface properties of PES ultrafiltration membranes to reduce the fouling resistance using synthesized hydrophilic copolymer, Microporous Mesoporous Material. 2012; 160:114-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.04.036
Shoparwe N F, Kee L C, Otitoju T A, Shukor H, Zainuddin N, and Makhtar M M Z. Removal of humic acid using 3-methacryloxypropyl trimethoxysilane functionalized MWCNT Loaded TiO2/PES hybrid membrane, Membranes (Basel). 2021; 11(9):721. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11090721
Ariono D, Khoiruddin, Prabandari D, Wulandari R, and Wenten I G. Preparation and characterization of polysulfone/PEG heterogeneous ion exchange membrane for reverse electrodialysis (RED), J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017; 877(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/877/1/012075
Folgado E, Ladmiral V, and Semsarilar M. Towards permanent hydrophilic PVDF membranes. Amphiphilic PVDF-b-PEG-b-PVDF triblock copolymer as membrane additive, Eur. Polym. J. 2020; 131:109708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109708
Toosi M R, Emami M R S, and Hajian S. Dynamic filtration and static adsorption of lead ions in aqueous solution by use of blended polysulfone membranes with nano size MCM-41 particles coated by polyaniline, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018; 25(20):20217-20230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2236-3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ismail, N. Q., Yusoff, A. H., Shoparwe, N. F., Yusof, N. N., Noorazlan, M., Ameram, N., & Fares, M. M.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.